Chuyển đến nội dung chính

The television channel broke into this category

Relatively recently, the BBC has become a beacon of popular culture. The television channel broke into this category with the aid of shows with cult followings and well-known actors- remakes like Doctor Who (2005), re-imaginings like Sherlock (2010), and historical dramas like Downton Abbey (2010). Before this modern era of broadcast, the BBC produced a slew of well-received and painfully detailed (at least, to my younger, crankier self who used them to stay up past bedtime) miniseries. Some examples that come to mind are the 1973 four hour long Jane Eyre and the 1995 six-episode Pride and Prejudice.

https://365movies.is/

 Around that same time, apparently, they cut Shakespeare's plays to under a half an hour (25:47, to be exact) and filmed them using Claymation. Clearly the second half of the twentieth century was a branching point for the BBC, turning away from animation films (short though they may have been) and towards live-acted series with big name actors (for example Colin Firth and Jennifer Ehle in P&P, way to start that trend with a bang!). Since the BBC's Animated Tales recounting of The Taming of the Shrew is so shortened, it is understandably a bit simplified. The enveloping narrative gets a bit rushed through, with only the barest bones of that story line coming through. The drunkard is found, the lord decides to play his trick, and the scene cuts to him passed out in a poster bed. From there, his name is only mentioned in passing, no one dresses up as Christopher-Sly-turned-Lord's wife, and he never leaves his borrowed bed or changes from his borrowed pajamas. Once the play within the play begins, the simplification continues. 



Kate and Petruchio's portion of the play becomes the meat of the entire twenty five odd minutes. Both Bianca's complicated story with her multiple suitors and Lucentio's subterfuge in swapping places with his servant in order to woo her under her father's nose become background noise. The only times they come into clarity are when they feed back into the drama of the "taming." First, Bianca's situation and her options are used as a way to introduce Kate and establish her as her sister's foil. Then, the two marriages other than the focus couple's and the ways they come about (sneakily dating and older widow as backup plan) are sped through in order to bring said couple back to Padua and lay the groundwork for the competition of wives. Even so, the explanation of these side tales is delivered through the tiny narrator who seems to exist in both the play and reality, without a clear position in either. The "taming" itself is even condensed. This begins on their wedding day, when Petruchio refuses to allow Kate to eat or celebrate with their guests. Instead, Petruchio manhandles a protesting Kate out of the hall, onto a horse, and through a thunder storm. They arrive at their home to find frenzied servants, whom Kate meets in complete disarray from a tough journey that included rough riding, falling from her horse, and more water and mud than her bridal getup could survive.

 From there, Petruchio refuses her food under the pretense that it is burnt and flings her bedclothes from her chamber. He also rips and tears her new clothes in front of her. There is also the argument the two have over whether it is the moon or the sun in the sky. These last two seem to have the greatest impact on Kate. In the first night, she responds to the food withholding with the normal despair of someone who had traveled in less than ideal circumstances. We Don't see her reaction to her room being turned upside down because she is in the room. When her clothes are ripped, though, she falls immediately into despair. 

She gently touches the scraps and weeps that they were the finest she'd ever seen. While debating the time of day, Kate puts up what seems like a token resistance before claiming to believe whatever he husband says. Even then, though, she doesn't appear fully "tamed," so the competition scene seemed a little abrupt to me. A huge difference I noticed between this adaptation of The Taming of the Shrew and others I've seen (Kiss Me Kate and the version with Elizabeth Taylor and Richard Burton come to mind), is the lack of emphasis placed on spanking. The only time Petruchio hits Kate in such a way is when they first meet and exchange barbed words while dancing. He pats her behind when he says that everyone knows where the wasp keeps its stinger. I'm assuming this change in emphasis stems both from the fact that they're not people and from the evolving ideas regarding women and men's interactions in the 30 odd years between the films were produced.

Nhận xét

Bài đăng phổ biến từ blog này

I love Monster, Zombie & War movies

I love Monster, Zombie & War movies ...I wish this movie could have decided what it wanted to be. Were the real "Horrors of War" your fellow soldiers attitudes? How they treat civilians? The decisions you must make to redeem yourself and save others? Mad Scientists? Nazi Mutant Zombies?  French Werewolfs? Well, I was really hoping for more of the latter 3, (and more gore) but this could have worked as regular a war movie with any Nazi super weapon, the monster element seemed tacked on (especially there whole werewolf part, it seemed very much a pointless sidebar). I'd have rather seen more of a real Monster threat in a war setting.  The monsters came one at a time, and slowly. there wasn't much of a perceived 'Monster threat' leading to a big showdown, the big showdown was...well, awkward. Out of nowhere the Mutant Mad Doc and Werewolf start fighting, and the werewolf dies like a vampire...then after the "sacrificial choice", between a fam...

Worst WW2 movie ever

Worst WW2 movie ever Oh well, here I was, seeing the high rating and reading about Nazis and werewolfs. Well, there are probably some Nazis in it. I guess. From the bad acting, they could have been drunks in German WW2 clothings. About that WW2 factor: That were some of the most awful WW2 combat scenes I've ever seen. The special effects sucked big time, the sound effects were so damn wrong, and the CGI muzzle flashes and blood gave me the rest. Oh, but wait, there are monsters too. Monsters that looked as horrible as in Uwe Bolls infamous House of the Dead. Was I scared? Yes, that this horrible bad movie will never end. From the crappy intro to the long awaited end credits, this movie is an awful war movie and an even more awful horror movie. Do yourself a favor and run if you see that movie. If you like the WW2 themed horror movies, there are better titles of that genre available. Most of them aren't good, but at least they are better than this crap. This movi...

Fascism via De Sade

I'm going to keep this short. If you want to see Salo simply to see what all the hype is about, keep your $600. Or rent it. If you can find it. I happen to own the Criterion release that is now being ripped and sold on Ebay for $400-600 bucks. Is it worth it? No. Is any film? No. Is it an excellent film? Absolutely. https://365movies.is/ Try not to think of Pasolini's masterpiece as a shock-for-shock's sake project and you'll truly understand the horror that is Salo. While the depiction of violence, sodomy, corpophagia, eye-gouging, scalping, nipple burning with candles, etc. etc. is horrific it is Pasolini's treatment of the boys and girls that is much more horrifying. The monsters that occupy this small space of two hours, the fascists, are more human that their victims. We are given no insight into the lives of these children, while we are shown at great length the heads of state personal histories and sadistic proclivities. Salo has stood the test ...